Quick Links

Planning Services Division Quick Links


Allegany County Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Element



TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

The Transportation Element is part of the Allegany County Comprehensive Plan. It is intended to serve as a guide for transportation services to local and state elected officials, local transportation agencies and the Maryland Department of Transportation.

 

Back to Top

 

ISTEA PROGRAM

Additionally, the Plan attempts to meet the overall goals of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) by integrating land use planning and transportation planning and by viewing the various transportation modes as a network, rather than as separate entities.

As noted under Goal 3, in the Visions, Goals & Objectives Element, one of the County's stated objectives is to "provide a transportation network composed of an adequate road system, bus, railroad and air service to move people and goods with maximum efficiency between residential areas, employment centers, and other facilities." In essence this statement focuses the County's transportation goals in the same manner as the stated purpose of the ISTEA program. All modes of transportation are to be viewed as a network connecting with one another and with various destination points.

 

Back to Top


PLAN SECTIONS

The Highway Plan Section contains a number of goals which chart a course for highway and local street development between now and the year 2020. The plan also notes a number of needed improvements both to County and State highways. In addition, the Highway Plan sets forth basic design standards for new highways or streets that are to become a part of the County Roads System. A separate document, the Highway Classification System, provides an index to Major Highways and Streets within the County. Copies of that document are available for review in the County Planning Department.

The Rail System Section illustrates the existing rail lines that serve Allegany County and briefly describes the flow of freight and passenger traffic through the County. Industrial rail spurs and tourist based service such as the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad are also described. Abandoned rail lines are also shown in their historic perspective.

The Air Travel Section briefly describes the current Airport Master Plan for the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport and looks at passenger travel between Cumberland and nearby airports where connections can be made to larger cities and suggests future service potential.

The Mass Transit Section reviews the current Mass Transit Plan and describes both the fixed route system served by a full-size bus fleet, as well as the para transit demand/response system served by van size equipment. This section also briefly describes opportunities for local rail service in the future. A separate document under preparation by the Planning Department provides a detailed description and plan for Mass Transit Service in the County.

The Trails Section describes the Trail Plan which appears in the County Open Space Plan. This plan suggests creation of a network of trails connecting existing open space in State & Federal parks and forests with abandoned rail lines, powerlines, greenways and other rights-of-way.

 

Back to Top


TRANSPORTATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Policies

1 . Develop and maintain an integrated transportation system utilizing rail, air, and highway systems using both mass transit and personal transportation modes to meet the overall goal of the ISTEA Program.

2. Encourage the use and development of transportation facilities which will minimize growth in automobile use.

3. Encourage implementation and use of transportation alternatives to decrease the growth of automobile use.

4. Promote the design and development of energy efficient communities and travel patterns.

5. Plan for, develop, and encourage the use of alternatives to single-occupant automobiles.

6. Promote the use of Mass Transit, including bus, van, car pooling, rail, air, and related modes of transportation through a public awareness campaign.

7. Promote walking, hiking, biking and other human powered transport by supporting walkways, paths and trails to tie existing urban areas together through a system of Greenways and Trails.

Standards And Procedures

1 . The County will require setbacks for building from Arterial and other streets and highways as set forth in the Land Development Regulations.

2. The County will require spacing of 750 feet for entrances for urban uses on Arterial Highways in the State maintained system.

3. The County will require a minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet for newly dedicated County roads and streets and may require additional right-of-way for bridges or other structures.

4. Roads and bridges which are constructed to be taken into the County System will at a minimum, meet the standards set forth in the Land Development Regulations.

5. The County will require billboards and signs to meet State Highway Administration Standards on Arterial Highways.

6. The County will regulate the use and height of structures in Airport Runway Approach zones in the Land Development Regulations and will coordinate land use policy with Mineral County to assure protection of the runway approach zones in West Virginia.

7. The County will require setbacks from railroads in the Land Development Regulations.

 

Back to Top


MAJOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTES

A modern transportation network is a key item in developing and promoting the concept of the Allegany County Service Area. At the present time, the Allegany County Area is served by the CSX Railway System, AMTRAK, the U.S. Air commuter service, and a number of highways, including the recently completed Route I-68 which connects Cumberland to both Morgantown and Hagerstown via I-79 and 1-70 respectively.

Plate 13 shows the rail lines currently in use in the Allegany County Area. While most of these lines are designed for freight service between the mid-west and the eastern seaboard, they do have the local effect of centering rail-yard activity in Cumberland. In addition, as noted above, AMTRAK schedules one passenger train per day in each direction between Washington and Chicago, via the CSX System with stops in Cumberland.

At the present time, the only regularly scheduled air service at Cumberland is currently provided by U.S. Air to Pittsburgh, with connections to other cities from that point. Regional airports in or near the Service Area are shown on Plate 14. Several of these airports have regularly scheduled service with connections to larger cities.

As noted in the Plan Concept Element, Plate 4 shows the major highways in the Allegany County Area. In this case, major north-south and east-west highways which pass through or near Cumberland, intersect at or near Hagerstown, Morgantown, Winchester, Altoona, Johnstown, and also at smaller towns such as Romney, Somerset, and Bedford.

 

Back to Top


THE HIGHWAY SYSTEM

The first transportation policy states that the County should "develop and maintain an integrated transportation system utilizing rail, air, and highway systems, using both mass transit and personal transportation modes."

Another policy in the Land Use Element states that the County should "encourage new urban development to locate adjacent to existing built-up areas and serve this new development with new streets and extensions of public water and sewerage systems as capacity allows."

These policies sum up the County's needs in terms of highway development. Namely, that highways are an integral part of the overall transportation system; that the County must be tied to other urban centers by improved all-weather highways; that the County itself must have adequate streets and highways serving and connecting local residential, commercial, and industrial areas; that future highway and street development must be accomplished within the established framework of urban development in the County; and that the highways and streets taken into the County system be adequately constructed and maintained.

 

Back to Top

 

The Highway Classification System

Because of the varied nature of the highway system in Allegany County, and the increasingly different functions which certain highways perform, it is necessary that a system be utilized for classifying the County's highways and streets.

Under this system, which is based on the Federal Functional Highway Classification System, existing highways and streets are grouped according to the function which they perform, not the system they are in, not their present width, surface type, or condition. Future highways and streets are to be built and maintained according to their function regardless of system, present construction or condition. The Classification System includes the following categories:

  • Principal Arterials
  • Major Arterials
  • Minor Arterials
  • Connector Streets
  • Collector Streets

Note that all County and State highways and streets are not included in the classification system. All highways, roads, and streets which perform a purely local function for access to individual properties are classified as local streets and are not listed individually.

The classification system is outlined in a separate document entitled "The Highway Classification System" which is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan and is available in the County Planning Department.

 

Back to Top

The Current Highway System

The highway system of Allegany County contains a small number of Arterial Highways and a large number of connecting and collecting roads and streets. Most of the Arterial Highways are in the State Highway Administration System, while the connector and collector roads and streets are primarily in the County System. As shown on Plate 15, the Arterial system includes two Principal Arterial Highways; I-68 connecting the County with urban centers to the east and west; and Rt. 220 connecting the County with points to the north and south.

The highway system also contains a number of Major Arterial Highways which connect the County with adjacent counties and form the basic inter-County network. These highways include: Rt. 36 between Westernport, Frostburg and LaVale; Route 51, which leads to Winchester, Va.; Route 135 between McCoole, Westernport and Southern Garrett County; Route 47, which leads to Somerset, Pennsylvania; Route 35, which leads to Hyndman, Pa.; and Route 53 between I-68 in LaVale and Rt. 220 at Cresaptown. Recent traffic count trends for these Arterial Highways are shown on Plate 16.

Other State highways and major County roads are Minor Arterial Highways which basically serve intra-county travel. These Minor Arterial Roads include Alt. Route 40 between Frostburg and Cumberland, Midlothian Road at Frostburg, Willowbrook-Williams Road-Messick Road at Cumberland and Bear Hill-Town Creek Road between Oldtown and Flintstone.

Other roads and streets which connect more remote areas of the county with urban centers (Connectors) or which are generally designed to serve residential suburban travel (Collectors) are for the most part in the County Road System.

In 1993, the county maintained system included over 800 road segments totaling more than 550 miles and 100 bridges. Approximately 200 miles of County System roadways are unpaved. The county system includes roads which perform several different functions. Several of the roads serve as Arterial Highways connecting communities or Arterial state highways. Examples include: Midlothian Road between the National Freeway and Frostburg; Williams Road, Valley Road and Cash Valley Road. Other roads connect non-urban areas with Arterial Highways or with urban centers. Nearly all the County roads east of Cumberland are in this category.

Finally, many of the smaller county road segments serve as collecting roads in residential areas in the suburbs of LaVale, Cresaptown, Bowling Green Potomac Park, and in the older residential communities such as Mt. Savage, Eckhart, and the incorporated areas of Georges Creek.

 

Back to Top


PROPOSED MAJOR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS

Rt. 220 North

The major State Highway System need in the County is the completion of new Rt. 220 (see Plate 17) from Pennsylvania to West Virginia (with connections to Cresaptown and Rt. 956). This project is seriously needed to tie Cumberland and Allegany County with Bedford County and Altoona, Pennsylvania, and with the West Virginia counties in the southern part of the county's service area (see Plate 18). This road also traverses the major growth area of the County in the Potomac Valley. Planned extensions of water and sewer service in this growth area should coincide with the construction of the highway.

Existing Route 220 north from Cumberland serves a growing residential area, provides access to a shopping area at the city boundary and to many small commercial uses up to the Pennsylvania border. As noted on Plate 16, traffic counts in the area north of Cumberland have increased steadily since 1983 from 6,650 vehicles per day to more than 10,400 vehicles per day in 1994. Because of urban development adjacent to the existing highway, its major function as an arterial route from Bedford, Pennsylvania to Cumberland is diminished. Construction of Rt. 220 north is in the current Maryland Consolidated Transportation Program.

Back to Top

Rt. 220 South

The Route 220 Corridor south of Cumberland includes both existing Route 220 and Rt. 53 (Winchester Road). The Traffic Volume Map on Plate 16 illustrates the current traffic on Rt. 220 between Cumberland and Keyser and further south to Rt. 50. Traffic counts on Rt. 220 South ranged up to 12,900 vehicles per day in 1992 and 15,600 vehicles per day on Rt. 53 in 1993. These highways pass through the residential areas of Winchester Road, Bowling Green, Potomac Park, Cresaptown, Bel Air and Rawlings. These highways currently serve the Country Club Mall and other shopping areas in LaVale as well as the Upper Potomac Industrial Park at Bowling Green, the County Fairgrounds, the County VoTech Center, and the Allegany Ballistics Laboratory on Rt. 956 near Pinto. They will also serve the proposed Western Correctional Institute and County Detention Center being planned at the former Celanese Plant site at Amcelle near Cresaptown. As shown on Plate 16, traffic counts on both Rt. 220S and Rt. 53 have increased steadily since 1983 to more than 15,000 vehicles per day.

This corridor is also a growing residential area with some strip commercial development. Many vacant buildable lots exist in the corridor that could also be developed for residential use. Finally, the long-range development of currently vacant land west of existing Route 220 between Bel Air and Rawlings is dependent on the relocation of Rt. 220 to separate local traffic from through traffic. Proposed industrial development near Rt. 956 is also dependent on this new highway. The traffic volume on Route 220 at Bel Air (over 14,000 vehicles per day in 1989) certainly justifies a new limited access highway to Rawlings at the very least. To ease the current conflict between local and through traffic, and permit further efficient development, the State must be encouraged to construct a new Route 220 that eventually will connect Cumberland with Corridor H south of Keyser. Construction of Rt. 220 South is currently listed in the State Highway Administration list of Highway needs.

Back to Top

Rt. 36

The next major State Highway system need is the completion of Route 36 from Piedmont, West Virginia to Barrellville. A high priority should be given to dualizing Route 36 between I-68 and Alt. Route 40 as this is the major growth corridor for commercial and industrial development in the Frostburg Area.

Completion of the section of Rt. 36 between Midland and the section of new highway south of Lonaconing is in the Consolidated Transportation Program. Daily traffic counts along Rt. 36 vary from 7,600 vehicles per day near Lonaconing to 2,900 near Mt. Savage. However, needed improvements to this road are more related to geometrics and sight distance than to traffic volume.

Back to Top

Canal Parkway

A new road connecting Rt. 51 with Wiley Ford is currently being planned as the Canal Parkway and would provide improved access to the Cumberland Airport and West Virginia Route 28. This project is being planned in conjunction with the Canal Place project at the former C & O Canal Basin in downtown Cumberland. This highway is also included in the Consolidated Transportation Program.

Back to Top

Long Term Freeway Improvements

Although these projects are not currently on the State's Capital Improvement Program or Needs listing, long-term planning needs to address improvements to I-68 through Cumberland. In the event such improvements are not feasible, the State needs to consider bypass of Cumberland, either to the North or South of Cumberland. In fact, by the year 2020, both a North and South Bypass may be necessary to accommodate traffic through the area and to serve expected growth in the Potomac Valley and in nearby West Virginia.

Back to Top

Other State Highway Needs

Another State highway need is a new Route 51 between Spring Gap and Oldtown. This road should ultimately be relocated throughout its length to tie in with Rt. 522 north of Winchester, Virginia. Another State Highway need is a reconstructed Route 35 from Corriganville into Pennsylvania with an Ellerslie bypass. This bypass is necessary to handle expected residential growth in that area. Recent water and sewer extensions along existing Rt. 35 are going to focus new development between LaVale and Ellerslie along this highway. Finally, Rt. 47 between Rt. 36 at Barrellville and Wellersburg, Pennsylvania needs to be upgraded to improve this connection to the Pennsylvania Turnpike at Somerset, Pennsylvania.

Other State highways which need to be upgraded include Alt. Rt. 40 between Campground Road and Rt. 36 in LaVale and Rt. 936 between Alt. Rt. 40 in Frostburg and Rt. 36 at Midland and existing Rt. 220 in McCoole to provide an improved tie-in with the State of West Virginia in Keyser.

Back to Top

 

County and Municipal Highway Needs

Major improvements also need to be made to certain County and municipal roads, namely widening, straightening and resurfacing (Plate 19). These include Christie-Neal Roads, Cash Valley Road and Pleasant Valley Road near Rocky Gap State Park, as well as connections between local streets in a number of suburban areas. These connections include: Gramlich Road-Wieres Avenue - Alt. Rt. 40 in LaVale; Barton Boulevard - No. Bel Air Drive in Bel Air; and Sixth Avenue - Darrows Lane in Cresaptown; and another connecting link between Sunset View and the Bishop Walsh Area in Cumberland. Finally, the extension of Midlothian Road within the City of Frostburg should be reconstructed to Alt. Route 40, as it serves as one of the main connecting routes between Frostburg State University and downtown Frostburg.

In addition, many County and municipal bridges will need to be updated or replaced in the near future. These bridge projects are normally very expensive and require federal and state funding assistance. A complete list of proposed bridge projects and bridge status reports are available in the County Public Works Department.

Further, nearly all County roads in the Georges Creek Coal Basin region need extra maintenance and heavily traveled coal haul roads should be reconstructed to handle heavy coal truck traffic.

So far as other County roads are concerned, an inordinately large percentage of connecting routes in the County Road System is in the eastern area of the county. On a per capita and per mile basis, much more money is spent on county roads in this area than in the central and western areas where population is concentrated. Major county roads in this area are Williams Road, Murley Branch Road, Town Creek-Bear Hill Road and Orleans-Oldtown Road. The latter road needs re-alignment and hard surfacing to improve connections between I-68 and with the C & O Canal National Park at Paw Paw. This road could be constructed by the State as a Scenic Parkway with access to nearby scenic overlooks, while limiting access to adjacent property.

 

Back to Top

County Road Standards

The set of standards referred to in this document are contained in the County Land Use Regulations and are designed to pertain only to roads which are to be built for inclusion in the County Maintained System, or to existing County roads which are to be improved. The standards do not apply to the State Highway system, nor to local roads outside the County system. However, all newly dedicated rights-of-way are to be at least 50 feet in width even when the road is not to be included in the County system. This set of standards is to be utilized with the County Subdivision Regulations with respect to new land development in the County.

When OP (other public) roads are added to the County maintained system, such roads are to be build to County Road Standards and may be constructed through the Revolving Road Fund Account procedure.

 

Back to Top

 

County Road, Street and Bridge Maintenance and Paving Program

While the road standards mentioned above are primarily related to new roads and streets being constructed for the County Maintained System, it is imperative that existing County maintained roads, streets and bridges be maintained and upgraded to satisfy their function.

As part of the ISTEA Program, the County Roads Division of the Public Works Department is developing management systems to address highway paving, bridges, highway safety and traffic congestion. These programs are in addition to the other ISTEA Program Elements addressed earlier in the Transportation Element.

The following items address these needs through the County Public Works Department, Roads Division, and are updated annually. These items are funded jointly through the use of Federal, State and local programs including coal haul road taxes. The current County share is approximately 20% of total funding for the annual Roads Division budget. With proposed funding changes at the federal level, it is anticipated that a higher percentage of local funding will be required in the future to maintain the existing system. The County Roads Division Program is as follows:

1 . An ongoing paving and overlay program which lists every County maintained road or street and its maintenance-paving needs. Those roads and streets in commercial and residential areas are prioritized higher than those in rural areas serving fewer people.

2. New road construction projects for existing County roads, streets, and bridges are being prioritized in a 5 year capital program similar to the State Highway Administration construction program.

3. Safety projects, drainage improvements, and bridge repairs are also prioritized in a 5 year capital program. Bridges are inspected on a regular basis and are programmed for repairs and reconstruction based on these inspections.

In addition, the total County road, street and bridge maintenance program is updated annually by the Public Works Department with input from various County agencies and citizens, and approved by the County Commissioners.

Back to Top

 

Park and Ride Facilities

Although traffic congestion in Allegany County has not reached the levels documented in larger urbanized areas, efforts have been made to accommodate ride-sharing through the construction of Park and Ride facilities near major routes. To date, most of these facilities have been built on excess SHA land near I-68 interchanges. Currently, Park and Ride lots include the following locations:

  • Rt. 36 south of Frostburg
  • Rt. 220 south of Cumberland
  • Rt. 220 & Rt. 144 north of Cumberland

Planned Park and Ride facilities near I-68 include:

  • Rt. 144 at Flintstone
  • Rt. 220 north of Cumberland (on a new site near the existing facility)
  • Other areas where Park & Ride lots could be constructed include:
  • SHA District Headquarters - LaVale I-68 and Orleans Road
  • Rt. 36 near Westernport
  • Rt. 220 near McCoole
  • Rt. 220 near Rt. 956
  • Rt. 220 near Cresaptown
  • Rt. 51 near Mexico Farms

Back to Top

 

THE RAIL SYSTEM

Prior to 1940, the rail system in Allegany County and the surrounding area was much more extensive than it is today. The older systems, including the B & O, Western Maryland, C & P and other less well known rail lines competed to serve the coal industry in the western part of Allegany County and as a by product of that service, also provided an excellent passenger system between Cumberland, Frostburg and Westernport.

In addition the B & O and Western Maryland served as freight and passenger carriers between Cumberland, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Washington. At its greatest extent rail service was available to Bedford and Altoona via the Pennsylvania Railroad, to Johnstown via Somerset; to Grafton, Elkins and many other West Virginia towns via the Western Maryland and B & O and to Petersburg and Moorefield via the B & O's South Branch line. Passenger service was available on most of these lines as well. Within Allegany County the C & P Railroad and the Georges Creek and Cumberland Railroad connected nearly every community in the Georges Creek and Jennings Run Valleys with Cumberland and Frostburg. These lines also had connections with the B & O and Western Maryland lines and for many years with the C & O Canal in Cumberland.

Following World War II as coal mining declined, many of the shorter lines in the Georges Creek area were abandoned or consolidated into the B & O or Western Maryland systems which eventually became part of the CSX System. By the early 1970's most of the Western Maryland main line was abandoned through the County when the CSX Corporation was formed, and the link to the Pennsylvania Railroad at Bedford was also abandoned.

 

Back to Top

The Current Rail System

Rail service as it exists today in the area, is shown on Plate 13. In addition to the main CSX lines to Pittsburgh and Washington, the CSX Corporation retains the other main western line to the West Virginia coal fields, and several pieces of the old system in the Georges Creek Valley west of Cumberland. These include a part of the old C & P System from Westernport to Shaft along Rt. 36, a line along the North Branch of the Potomac west of McCoole, Md., and several related coal spur lines in West Virginia. The old South Branch line of the B & O is now operated by the State of West Virginia between Greenspring and Petersburg W.Va.

In addition, the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad operates a Tourist related passenger train on a seasonal basis on a section of the old Western Maryland and C & P roadbed between Cumberland and Frostburg.

Back to Top

CSX Freight Movement

Rail activity is centered at the CSX yards in South Cumberland where trains are made up for travel both east and west of Cumberland. Composition of freight trains include general freight, trailer trains, and special coal trains. While a small percentage of this coal is mined and loaded in Allegany County, the majority is loaded in Garrett County and West Virginia.

Back to Top

Industrial Park/ Rail Siding Use

While the County has very little impact on CSX rail traffic through the area, one facet of rail service that impacts land use planning is the location of rail sidings. Currently most County Industrial parks and Industrially-zoned areas are adjacent to CSX System rail lines. Sidings are currently in place at the Mexico Farms site, former Kelly Springfield Plant site, and the Westvaco site in Luke. CSX System tracks pass by the Upper Potomac Industrial Park, the Pinto site, the Black Oak site and the Westernport site. These industrial parks and Industrially-zoned areas are situated adjacent to tracks where sidings could be constructed to serve industrial customers.

Sidings are also in place at several coal loading and washing facilities in the Georges Creek Basin. According to the County's Economic Development Department, the availability of sidings is an important factor of industrial location, particularly for uses where larger amounts of raw materials are being moved. Thus, the development of new Industrial Parks needs to include plans for rail sidings at those sites adjacent or near the CSX system.

Back to Top

 

Amtrak Passenger Service

Currently one train per day passes through Cumberland in each direction between Washington D.C., Pittsburgh, and Chicago. Connections can be made in those cities to other Amtrak lines serving the East Coast and the Western States.

Back to Top

Western Maryland Scenic Railroad

In the late 1980's, the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad began operations as the Allegany Central Railroad between the former Western Maryland Station in Cumberland and the former C & P Railroad Depot at Frostburg. Following a number of changes in management, the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad added a steam powered locomotive in the summer of 1993. Ridership on the line appears to have stabilized after this addition.

Current plans call for development of the Western Maryland Station and the C & O Canal Terminus into a tourist destination center in Cumberland under the auspices of the Canal Place Development Commission. A transportation museum and renovated Depot Restaurant will provide amenities to tourists at the Frostburg terminus of the line. Both the City of Cumberland and the City of Frostburg are encouraged to provide zoning regulations to ensure the desired land uses at each terminal. Much of the Scenic Railroad line itself lies within the unincorporated area of the County and is planned primarily for agriculture, forestry and conservation zoning to protect the scenic route of the line.

Other scenic rail tours in the area are offered annually on the CSX system during the Autumn of the year and on the South Branch Valley Railroad on weekends and during the Fall season. Plans for the development of several other scenic railroads in the area have been discussed but not formalized. A network of scenic railroads, wherein the traveler could spend a number of days in the area riding over several different routes would be an attractive way to serve the touring public.

Back to Top

Rail Service Summation

Unlike publicly operated modes of transportation, County government has little if any influence on the level of rail service or traffic. However, the County can address several factors related to rail service in a positive manner.

These include:

  • Encouraging the CSX system to continue to modernize and upgrade the rail system, particularly the rail yard and related components of the system.
  • Encouraging the CSX system to cooperate with the City of Cumberland to develop railroad property that is suitable for industrial use.
  • Promoting the use of rail service, particularly with respect to coal traffic that originates in or near the area.
  • Promoting a network of scenic railroads in the area as part of the growing tourism industry.
  • Encouraging industrial site development in conjunction with rail sidings.

Back to Top

AIR TRAVEL

As noted earlier, an updated Master Plan for the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport details a program for making a number of improvements to the airport facility. As further noted in that plan the airport property is owned by the City of Cumberland and operated by the Potomac Highlands Airport Authority through a lease agreement. The current version of the Airport Plan is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan.

As defined by the Maryland Department of Transportation, the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport is one of four primary airports which serve Western Maryland, with the others being Garrett Co. Airport, Washington Co. Airport and Frederick Airport. The Greater Cumberland Regional Airport is further defined as a short haul commercial airport (less than 1,500 mile radius for commercial service).

From an historic perspective, the Cumberland Airport was conceived as a public works project in the late 1930's and was constructed during the early 1940's to replace the Mexico Farms Airfield. The Mexico Farms facility dates to the World War I era and was an early stop for air mail service. The Mexico Farms Airfield continues in use today as a privately owned, public use airfield.

The original Cumberland Airport layout included a 4,300 foot x 150 foot paved runway (known as runway 6-24) and several landing areas. The original paved runway was extended to 5,790 feet and two other runways (11-29 and 1-19) were paved during the 1950's. In 1977 a new 5,050 foot x 150 foot runway (known as runway 5-23) was constructed on a new alignment and the former main runway (6-24) and one secondary runway (1-19) were converted to taxiways. This configuration (see Plate 20) continues in service today.

Runway 11-29 is a visual approach runway, while runway 5-23 is a nonprecision instrument runway. Future plans call for runway 5-23 to be a precision instrument runway.

Back to Top

Commercial Air Travel

During the late 1940's and early 1950's, Cumberland was served by Allegheny Airlines with connecting flights to Pittsburgh and other neighboring cities. During the 1960's, 1970's, and 1980's commuter flights to Baltimore, Washington, Pittsburgh, Latrobe, Pa., and Ocean City, Md., were provided by Nicholson Air Service and Cumberland Airlines. Nicholson also handled air mail service, air cargo, charter flights, flight instruction and related activities at the Airport.

Following the establishment of the Potomac Highlands Airport Authority, U. S. Air began regularly scheduled flights between Cumberland and Pittsburgh with connections to other cities from the Greater Pittsburgh Airport. Ridership on U. S. Air flights has since increased to more than 20,000 annually. In addition to the Pittsburgh route, potential routes that would connect Cumberland to the BWI and Dulles Airport near Baltimore and Washington are worthy of consideration.

Back to Top

Other Airport Uses

In addition to commercial air service, a number of locally owned and operated aircraft use the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport as the base of operations. According to the Airport Master Plan, the number of aircraft based at the airport has fluctuated between 65-93 over the past 20 years. Most of these craft are single engine airplanes (70-80%) used for private purposes. In addition, a number of local firms, including the Kelly-Springfield Corporation, have planes based at the airport and make regular business flights from the Airport. In recent years, a state police Medivac Helicopter has also been stationed at the airport.

Back to Top

Runway Approaches, Runway Protection Zones and Imaginary Surfaces

The Airport Master Plan also addresses protection zones and imaginary surfaces related to each runway. These features have an impact on Land Use in Allegany County and need to be addressed in the upcoming revision to the County's Land Use Regulations. Allegany County plans to limit the height of structures within the Horizontal Surface area and runway approach surfaces and require Board of Appeals review of proposed structures which penetrate those surfaces.

As shown on Plate 21, the runway protection zones which have been established for the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport in the Master Plan primarily impact land use in Mineral County, WV. In fact, the airport runways are elevated more than 100 feet above the Potomac River where the runway protection zones extend into Maryland. A small portion of the CSX Rail yard in South Cumberland lies within the protection zone of runway 5-23, but this area is approximately 50' below the runway elevation. Both Mineral County and the City of Cumberland are encouraged to develop runway protection zones within their respective jurisdictions.

Imaginary surfaces associated with the airport would extend well into Allegany County. There surfaces, which have not been formally established for the airport, include a horizontal surface which has a radius of 10,000 feet around the primary runway at an elevation 150 feet above the airport runway and a conical surface which extends outward 4,000 feet from the horizontal surface at a slope of 20:1. Several of the higher hills in Cumberland as well as a portion of Irons Mountain extend into these imaginary surfaces.

Runway approach surfaces also extend into Maryland, primarily in association with runway 5-23, over the Evitts Creek Valley. At present, this runway has a non-precision instrument approach which extends outward 10,000 feet from the runway itself at a slope of 34: 1. Conversion of this runway to a precision instrument approach could lengthen the approach to 50,000 feet at a slope of 50:1 for the first 10,000 feet and 40:1 for an additional 40,000 feet.

Formal adoption of these imaginary surfaces into the Airport Master Plan would require more intensive monitoring of land use changes, particularly in the Evitts Creek Valley approach. Although the Mexico Farms landing field is not addressed in the Airport Master Plan, the same type of runway protection zones and imaginary surfaces need to be addressed for that facility. While this airfield does not have the level of activity as the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport, land use within these surface areas needs to be monitored to assure minimum impact on the landing field approaches.

Back to Top

 

Air Travel Summation:

As noted at the beginning of the Air Travel Section, a separate Airport Master Plan which is periodically updated, details a number of proposed improvements to the facility. These improvements are currently detailed in a Capital Improvement Program that is updated on an annual basis. Primary funding for these improvements is provided by the Federal government through the FAA. The States of Maryland and West Virginia also share in the cost of these improvements. Major improvements scheduled for the next several years include:

  • A new terminal
  • Repairing taxiways
  • Repairing runways
  • Replacing light towers
  • Improved fuel storage area

In addition, Runway Protection Zones and Imaginary Surfaces need to be formalized so that land use within these areas can be regulated through setback and height restrictions. Both the Greater Cumberland Regional Airport and the Mexico Farms Landing Field need to be protected from encroachments within these zones and imaginary surfaces. The County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations need to be modified to address these features.

Back to Top

MASS TRANSIT

Allegany County at one time had a very extensive "Rail Transit" System which was developed in conjunction with the railroad network that served the coal mining industry. In addition to the C & P Railroad which connected Cumberland with Westernport via the Jennings Run and Georges Creek Valleys, an electric trolley line connected Cumberland with Frostburg and Westernport via LaVale and Eckhart along Old Rt. 40 and Old Rt. 36. Other local service was provided by both the Western Maryland Railway and the B & O Railroad by providing stops at numerous communities along their main lines. Most of these rail and trolley lines were out of operation, in terms of local passenger service by the end of World War II.

The decline of local rail transit was accompanied by the development of passenger bus systems which grew during the 1920's and 1930's and connected many of the same communities that for years had relied on trains for passenger service. The opening of the Kelly Tire Plant in Cumberland and the Celanese Fibers Plant at Amcelle created a tremendous demand for bus service. Bus systems developed not only in Cumberland, but in Frostburg, Mt. Savage, Keyser, W.Va., Hyndman, Pa. and other communities where workers lived and commuted to these large manufacturing concerns.

However, as the use of the automobile increased and suburban growth spread after World War II with more people living farther from transit lines, many of these bus systems fell by the wayside. By the late 1960's, the Queen City Bus Lines in Cumberland was the only surviving local transit company. As this line's equipment fell into disrepair in the early 1970's, the County purchased the remaining buses and other equipment with state and federal funding assistance to keep the operation alive.

Since that time, the Transit System has been subsidized by local, state, and federal funding in order to maintain service. While many metropolitan areas in Maryland have turned to Transit as an option to reduce single occupant travel, Allegany County has not as yet defined single occupant travel as a major transportation problem. However, the core of the transit systems routes do cover the highest traffic areas and do offer an option for drivers to use.

Back to Top

 

Fixed Route System

In 1975, when Allegany County began running the bus system under the guidance of an appointed Transit Authority, the operation consisted of an aging bus fleet, a dilapidated garage and a small staff of employees, some of whom had been part owners of the old system.

Over the next several years, the County purchased a new fleet of buses, replaced the garage with a new facility, adjusted the routes and schedules, and brought the employees into the overall County System.

Since 1980, the fixed route system has seen a number of improvements with replacement buses that are handicapped accessible, air conditioned and exhibit the modern RTS design. Routes have been modified to provide additional service to high use areas outside Cumberland, such as the Country Club Mall in LaVale and the Upper Potomac Industrial Park in Bowling Green. At the same time, some holdover routes from the Queen City System which experienced declining ridership have been eliminated.

In addition to the City of Cumberland, LaVale and Frostburg, the system serves other suburban residential communities including Cresaptown, Bowling Green, Bel Air, Bedford Road and Mt. Savage. Future plans for the fixed route system (as detailed in the Updated Transit Development Program and Technical Study) call for replacement of the large size RTS bus fleet with mid-size buses over the next decade. The route system is also to be modified into a series of loops which will intersect at the Country Club Mall. One set of loops will essentially serve Cumberland, Cresaptown and LaVale, while another will serve Frostburg, Eckhart and LaVale. Additional service to the Georges Creek area and other communities will continue to be served as extensions of the two primary routes. (See Plate 22 for a map of this proposed Loop System). The current version of the Transit Development Plan is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan.

Back to Top

Demand/Response System (Paratransit)

During the mid-1980's, the County initiated a modified Demand/Response System through the Human Resources Development Commission as a program for the elderly and handicapped called ALL-TRANS. This system was Federally funded and provided for a van system with handicapped accessible vehicles. A medical transport system called MED-TRANS was also initiated under HRDC using State funding during the same time period. Both programs specify eligibility requirements for users of the system.

Additionally, a number of local groups and agencies provide transportation services for eligible citizens. These groups are also eligible for federal funding for vehicle purchases.
Following reorganization, the HRDC Paratransit systems were merged with the fixed route system at the Transit facility for administrative purposes. This reorganization has provided improved service to both elderly and handicapped users of the system. Dispatching is now done at one central location for both fixed route and paratransit.

Back to Top

Inter-City Service

As mentioned in the Rail Plan Section, AMTRAK currently serves Allegany County with one eastbound and one westbound train per day connecting Cumberland with Washington and Chicago. In addition, Greyhound Bus Lines also provide service to the County with stops in Cumberland and Frostburg. These buses pass through the County in an east-west direction between Washington/Baltimore and Pittsburgh.

Back to Top

 

TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN

The recently completed (1992) Maryland Greenway Atlas prepared by the Maryland Greenway Commission outlined a number of existing and potential hiking/biking trails and other greenways in Allegany County. The Allegany County Open Space Plan includes these and other trails as shown on Plate 23. These trails include the existing C & O Canal towpath and a number of abandoned rail lines.

Abandoned raillines include the following:

  1. The former Western Maryland Railway between Cumberland and Connellsville, Pa.
  2. The former Western Maryland railway between Cumberland and Sideling Creek paralleling the C & O Canal.
  3. The former Western Maryland Railway between Cumberland and McCoole near Keyser, WV
  4. The former C & P Railroad between Corriganville and Shaft near Frostburg
  5. The former Pennsylvania Railroad between the Narrows and Bedford, Pa.
  6. The former C & P Railroad between the Narrows and Eckhart
  7. The former Georges Creek and Cumberland Railroad between the Narrows and Lonaconing

Back to Top

Allegheny Highlands Trail

The proposed Allegheny Highlands Trail which would connect the C & O Canal with the Youghiogheny River Trail in Ohiopyle, Pennsylvania is designed to use the abandoned Western Maryland Railway right-of-way between Cumberland and Connellsville, Pa. Part of the proposed route parallels the Western Maryland Scenic Railroad east of Frostburg. An off-shoot from this trail would use the C & P line between Frostburg and Mt. Savage. A separate plan for the Maryland Section of this trail was prepared by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources in 1993.

Back to Top

Other Potential Trails

Other potential trails in Allegany County are essentially connecting trails that would tie the C & O Canal and Allegheny Highland Trails to public lands in other counties and states. These connecting links include a trail following the Western Maryland line along the North Branch of the Potomac through Garrett Co. to the Monongahela National Forest in West Virginia; a connecting link through Dan's Mountain Wildlife Management Area to the Big Savage hiking trail in Garrett County; a connecting link on the abandoned Pennsylvania Railroad right-of-way to Hyndman and a trail on Wills Mtn. to connect with Pennsylvania State Game Lands (these trails can connect in Pennsylvania); a connecting trail between Rocky Gap State Park and the Buchanan State Forest in Pennsylvania; and a connecting link between the Green Ridge Trail and the Buchanan State Forest in Pennsylvania. This trail could connect with the Mid-State Trail in Pennsylvania and eventually extend to State College, Pennsylvania.

Other, shorter, local trails are possible on utility rights-of-way and along stream reenways. These include a connecting link between Green Ridge and Warrior Mountain along a Potomac Edison right-of-way and various gasline rights-of-way. Other short trails are feasible on existing state and local parks. This includes the County Fairgrounds property, the Narrows property, the LaVale District Park and the South End Rec. area in Cumberland.

Ultimately, the creation of trails will allow Allegany County to meet one of its Open Space goals by creating a network of trails connecting urban areas with open space lands. This trail network connecting urban areas to open space would increase recreational opportunities for residents and also be an additional inducement for increasing tourism in the County.

Back to Top


Additional Sections of the Allegany County Comprehensive Plan:

Flexibity & Streamlining Element

Land Use Plan Element

Mineral Resources Element

Transportation Element

Sensitive Areas Element

Visions, Goals, & Objectives


Revised July 31, 1997

 

Last Updated:  Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:20:34 AM
Allegany County Planning Division
Allegany County Office Complex
701 Kelly Road, 1st Floor
Cumberland, Maryland 21502
Telephone: 301-777-2199
Email: planning@allconet.org